Guide

AI Agents and Automation: How to Choose for Your Workflow

By Todd Creek Updated September 8, 2026 3 min read

A report scheduler and an assistant that researches an account solve different problems. Calling both an agent makes it harder to compare what they do, what they cost, and how they should be supervised.

Separate the tasks before comparing tools

A workflow can contain several types of software. A rule might route a document, a language model might summarize it, and a person might approve the result. Ask a vendor to explain each part, including what happens when the input is incomplete or a connected system is unavailable.

Use rules for repeatable decisions

Rules-based automation follows a defined sequence. For example, an approved order can trigger an invoice, update a tracker, and notify the account owner. The decision logic is straightforward to inspect and test.

It still needs error handling. An API can fail, a record can be duplicated, or a required field can be missing. Specify retries, validation, and an escalation path rather than assuming the workflow will always complete.

Use an agent when the next step depends on what it finds

An AI agent can select tools and take several steps toward a goal. Researching an account may involve searching for information, comparing sources, and preparing a summary. The sequence may vary between runs.

That flexibility introduces uncertainty. Restrict the information and actions available to the agent, record its activity, and require approval before consequential actions such as sending a customer message.

Compare operating costs and failure modes

Rules are often a simpler choice for stable tasks. Agents may help with varied inputs, but model usage, testing, and review add costs. Compare the complete workflow, including the time people spend correcting or checking outputs.

Choose an approach for each step

Start with a workflow map. For each step, ask whether the decision can be stated as a rule, what information is needed, and what an incorrect result would cost.

An inconsistent process is not automatically a good agent use case. The team may first need to agree on how the task should be handled. Test any proposed AI step against representative cases, including difficult ones.

Combine approaches where it helps

A practical design might use rules for data movement, AI for interpreting a document, and a person for approval. Keep responsibilities clear between those steps. Evaluate whether each AI component improves the outcome enough to justify its additional cost and supervision.

Questions and answers

Does every AI workflow need an agent?

No. A single model call can classify or summarize information inside an otherwise rules-based workflow. An agent is useful when selecting and adapting a sequence of actions is part of the task.

Can an agent run without human approval?

That depends on the action and the consequences of a mistake. Begin with limited permissions and review. Expand autonomy only when testing and operational evidence justify it.

TC

Todd Creek

Todd Creek is the founder of Rock Creek Performance Partners. He works with clients on AI strategy and workflow automation. Connect on LinkedIn ↗

Keep reading

Related insights

For help evaluating a workflow, see what an AI opportunity assessment includes.